Skip to main content

Political ecology of urban trees in Turkey and elsewhere

Image: Gezi Park, Istanbul via Google Maps
If you have been following the protests in Turkey, you know they were triggered by the government's reaction to citizen protests against constructing a mall on Gezi Park, a central greenspace in Istanbul vegetated with hundreds of sycamores. In a blog post titled "Gezi Park, Nearby Nature, and Democracy", Naomi Sachs of Therapeutic Landscape Network asked, "Can you imagine a city without any parks?" Sachs observed that the protests in Turkey strongly point to "people’s need for green space." In the post, Sachs linked to Andy Revkin's "Urban Trees as Triggers, From Istanbul to Oregon" article in the New York Times. There, Revkin referenced the violent confrontation between people and police over the destruction of trees in downtown Eugene, Oregon on June 1, 1997.  He also linked to Carl Pope's about the Turkish protests. Popes asked, "What Is It About Trees?" and answered that "[t]rees ...become a tangible symbol of the common space which autocrats claim to serve, but actually destroy."

Pope is asking political ecology questions of the struggle in Turkey - about access to and control of natural resources. He provides other examples of resource conflicts such as Wangaari Matthei's response to President Daniel Arap Moi's park privatization effort and citizen protests against the Yadana oil pipeline in Myanmar. Local examples include the "long battle" between NYC Mayor Giuliani and the community gardens network and more recently, the political and legal battle to prevent New York University facilities on public open space (see Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation and NYU Faculty Against the Sexton Plan).   The proposed Major League Soccer (MLS) stadium in Flushing Meadows Corona Park in Queens will likely not happen. But we may soon hear protests from the Bronx; that borough's president is trying to lure MLS.  Another proposed open space taking is one by the NYC Housing Authority (NYCHA) to lease the park lands around its towers to private developers(Editor's Note: This post was edited to include sites of natural resource contestation.)

A potential conflict in Greenwich Village is the proposed Washington Square Park Conservancy which was reportedly developed without public comment.  Furthermore, the Village community has rejected a conservancy for the park in the past.  Keep an eye on this resource management situation at Washington Square Park Blog. I mention Washington Square Park in part because there is a striking design similarity between Gezi Park and Washington Square Park.

Image: Berkeley oak grove and police fence via UC Bill (source)
I was living in Berkeley, CA during the Oak Grove Protests.  There were times when it seemed that those who made claims about preserving the oaks would prevail.  It was Berkeley after all! In the end, the trees in the grove (including 65 oaks) were cut down and the UC Berkeley stadium expanded.

Do you have any predictions for Gezi Park and the nascent environmental movement in Turkey?

Comments

Eileen said…
Just published a long comment about east river park & the city’s appropriation of our green space. I don’t see it but it’s equally local & at least as urgent. I’ll write it all again but hope this sticks. Meanwhile follow @1000people1000trees on IG & Twitter. This is real estate grab not climate resiliency.
Eileen said…
Just published a long comment about east river park & the city’s appropriation of our green space. I don’t see it but it’s equally local & at least as urgent. I’ll write it all again but hope this sticks. Meanwhile follow @1000people1000trees on IG & Twitter. This is real estate grab not climate resiliency.