September 10, 2008

Tree Walk: Large oaks and redwoods removed for campus expansion

Twenty-two months after the start of what became the longest urban tree sit-in, the tree sitters have left their perch and the trees scheduled for removal have been removed. Arborists began clearing the grove on Friday, September 5, after a court ruled in favor of the university's proposed stadium expansion, but the last tree was cut yesterday at 5:18 p.m., reports the Berkeley Daily Planet. I watched Tuesday's spectacle unfold via a live feed provided by a local news station.

Elsewhere on campus, trees have been removed for construction. Several redwoods along Bancroft were stumped in preparation for the construction of a southern addition to the law school. The construction sign notes that

the project is being implemented in accordance with [the university's] green building practices.

Also, the law school is seeking LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification. The proposed "renovated courtyard and rooftop garden" will provide a "green and vibrant" respite. I miss the trees; on a hot day, this stretch of Bancroft is uncomfortable. Setting aside the debates about large tree removal, why were the trees removed so much in advance of construction? They could have been left in place to provide shade and habitat (and capture rainwater if construction extends into the winter).

2 comments:

  1. Bummer! :< Always sad to see the venerable old ones go. Especially for football and law school! I have walked that stretch of Bancroft many times, I can see that the loss of the trees will be unpleasant for pedestrians.
    - Karen
    http://greenwalks.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sometimes the removal of trees seems worse for those who don't work with trees.

    I've been on a "tree sitter" blog hunt this week, because I wrote a brief essay a few weeks ago - and I'd be itching to know how tree sitters would respond, if they thought a few redwood ecosystems needed protection from research climbers. The page is at:

    Wear & Tear: Redwood Canopy Trails

    The page is meant to be neutral, and lay the ideas in front of others.

    But I'm still curious about what alternative tree sitters would resort to, for trees that should not be climbed. And if there was a solution, would that same solution work for trees that they had been climbing.

    Cheers,

    MDV or OR

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for commenting on this post!
Sign up to receive new posts in your inbox - http://bit.ly/localeconews.